Book a demo
Portfolio Funding

Allocate capital to outcomes and adjust it as priorities change

Kiplot manages portfolio funding as a year-round process. Each initiative carries its approved budget, forecast, actuals and benefit case, with capex and opex treatment set on each cost line. Figures roll up to the portfolio, so reallocation decisions are taken on current numbers.

Portfolio Funding
Enterprise Investment Portfolio
Live
FY 26
Projects
147
↑ 12 QoQ
Budget
$284M
↑ 4% vs prior FY
Total Benefit
$812M
Forecasted
Portfolio RoI
2.9x
IRR 22%
Budget
$284.0M
Forecast
$271.4M
Actual
$187.6M
AWS
$24.3M
Deloitte
$18.7M
Microsoft
$12.1M
SAP
$8.9M
64%
Capex
Capex %64
Opex %36
BUSINESS CASES

Funding decisions made against the business case

Each allocation is linked to the initiative and the OKR it serves, with cost, benefit, ROI and payback in one view. When a cost estimate changes, ROI and payback recalculate, and the change is visible at the next funding decision.

kBusiness Case: AI-Powered UnderwritingFact SheetNameAI-Powered UnderwritingBusiness UnitCore OperationsOwnerHarry BeckStart DateJun 1, 2026End DateFeb 1, 2027Total Cost$5,000,000Approved $4,000,000ROI$3,160,000Benefit less total costPayback Period3.58yearsTarget 3.5 yearsProblem StatementFragmented underwriting systems constrainefficiency and complianceUnderwriting decisions are assembled across foursystems that do not share data. Case information isre-keyed at every hand-off, no single record of adecision exists, and median turnaround stands atnine working days against a market benchmark offour.Compliance reporting is compiled by hand eachquarter, and two of the four systems reach end ofvendor support within eighteen months. Theintegration debt has to be addressed on thattimetable regardless.Underwriters currently spend about a third of eachcase assembling data rather than judging the riskitself.ObjectivesReduce Underwriting Cycle TimeObjective:Automate evidence capture and riskscoring across the underwriting workflow.Measure:Median case turnaround from nine workingdays to three.Improve Decision ConsistencyObjective:Apply model-assisted scoring so everycase is assessed against one standard.Measure:Loss-ratio variance narrowed by 15 percentagainst the prior-year baseline.Strengthen Regulatory AssuranceObjective:Record a complete, queryable audit trailfor every automated decision.Measure:Full traceability on all decisions, evidencedin the quarterly control review.High Level PlanStage GateTask NameSepOctNovDec2027FebtodayPoVClient DeadlineFirst ReleaseGo Live1. DesignGuided Access ControlGranular Audit TrailInitial DesignAuthentication Platform2. BuildMarket Analysis FrameworkCustomer Portal Rollout3. TestE2E TestThroughput Design4. ImplementImplementation ManagementGo Live PlanningBusiness CaseReturn on investmentFY 2026FY 2027FY 2028FY 2029FY 2030FY 2031TotalCost-$5,000,000-$5,000,000Consultancy-$4,368,000-$4,368,000Software-$632,000-$632,000Benefit$2,000,000$1,880,000$1,880,000$2,000,000$400,000$8,160,000Ongoing Cost-$120,000-$120,000-$240,000Revenue$2,000,000$2,000,000$2,000,000$2,000,000$400,000$8,400,000Grand totals-$5,000,000$2,000,000$1,880,000$1,880,000$2,000,000$400,000$3,160,000Payback Plan-$6M-$4M-$2M$0$2M$4M$6M20272028202920302031
CAPEX AND OPEX

Capex and opex treatment recorded at the cost line

Each cost line carries its capitalization rate, so the capex and opex split is set where the cost is recorded. Budget, plan, forecast and actuals are held by month, and a forecast raised above budget shows as an overrun on the line, the month and the initiative as soon as it is entered.

v5.30.1.1SMAI-Powered UnderwritingOverall Financial PerformanceTotal BudgetTotal ForecastVarianceYear-to-date performanceForecast to dateActuals to dateVariance$1,574,000$1,568,000$1,592,000$6,000-$18,000$1,106,000$1,094,067$11,933StageDeliveryTypeStrategicTeamUnderwriting OpsOwnerDaniel OkaforFinancials Year: Jan 2026 - Dec 2026Add benefit itemAdd cost itemBudget:BudgetPlan:Business Casecurrent yearCostsItemCapExTypeJan 2026Feb 2026Mar 2026Apr 2026May 2026Jun 2026Jul 2026Aug 2026Sep 2026Oct 2026Nov 2026Dec 2026Year TotalGrand TotalCost / 3rd Parties / ConsultingAccenture60%Budget48,000 USD48,000 USD48,000 USD48,000 USD48,000 USD48,000 USD48,000 USD48,000 USD48,000 USD48,000 USD48,000 USD48,000 USD576,000 USD576,000 USDPlan48,000 USD48,000 USD48,000 USD48,000 USD48,000 USD48,000 USD48,000 USD48,000 USD48,000 USD48,000 USD48,000 USD48,000 USD576,000 USD576,000 USDForecast48,000 USD48,000 USD48,000 USD48,000 USD48,000 USD48,000 USD48,000 USD48,000 USD48,000 USD48,000 USD48,000 USD48,000 USD576,000 USD576,000 USD600,000 USD600,000 USDActual47,488 USD50,124 USD46,610 USD45,872 USD47,315 USD46,904 USD47,126 USD47,733 USD46,180 USD47,912 USD47,296 USD47,054 USD425,352 USD425,352 USDCost / Internal Labor / Data ScienceData Science Team75%Budget36,000 USD36,000 USD36,000 USD54,000 USD54,000 USD54,000 USD72,000 USD72,000 USD72,000 USD72,000 USD72,000 USD72,000 USD702,000 USD702,000 USDPlan36,000 USD36,000 USD36,000 USD54,000 USD54,000 USD54,000 USD72,000 USD72,000 USD72,000 USD72,000 USD72,000 USD72,000 USD702,000 USD702,000 USDForecast36,000 USD36,000 USD36,000 USD54,000 USD54,000 USD54,000 USD72,000 USD72,000 USD72,000 USD72,000 USD72,000 USD72,000 USD702,000 USD702,000 USDActual35,140 USD34,180 USD35,920 USD51,760 USD53,310 USD53,980 USD70,450 USD71,120 USD73,860 USD69,940 USD71,600 USD70,280 USD479,720 USD479,720 USDCost / Software / LicensesDatabricks-Budget8,000 USD8,000 USD8,000 USD12,000 USD12,000 USD12,000 USD16,000 USD16,000 USD16,000 USD16,000 USD16,000 USD16,000 USD156,000 USD156,000 USDPlan8,000 USD8,000 USD8,000 USD12,000 USD12,000 USD12,000 USD16,000 USD16,000 USD16,000 USD16,000 USD16,000 USD16,000 USD156,000 USD156,000 USDForecast8,000 USD8,000 USD8,000 USD12,000 USD12,000 USD12,000 USD16,000 USD16,000 USD16,000 USD15,000 USD15,000 USD14,000 USD152,000 USD152,000 USDActual7,412 USD7,612 USD7,958 USD11,604 USD12,817 USD11,932 USD15,486 USD15,903 USD15,771 USD14,820 USD14,690 USD13,950 USD106,495 USD106,495 USDCost / 3rd Parties / Model AssuranceKPMG-Budget40,000 USD40,000 USD60,000 USD140,000 USD140,000 USDPlan40,000 USD40,000 USD60,000 USD140,000 USD140,000 USDForecast40,000 USD40,000 USD58,000 USD138,000 USD138,000 USDActual40,000 USD42,500 USD57,400 USD82,500 USD82,500 USDTotalBudget92,000 USD92,000 USD132,000 USD114,000 USD114,000 USD114,000 USD176,000 USD136,000 USD136,000 USD136,000 USD196,000 USD136,000 USD1,574,000 USD1,574,000 USDPlan92,000 USD92,000 USD132,000 USD114,000 USD114,000 USD114,000 USD176,000 USD136,000 USD136,000 USD136,000 USD196,000 USD136,000 USD1,574,000 USD1,574,000 USDForecast92,000 USD92,000 USD132,000 USD114,000 USD114,000 USD114,000 USD176,000 USD136,000 USD136,000 USD135,000 USD193,000 USD134,000 USD1,568,000 USD1,568,000 USD1,592,000 USD1,592,000 USDActual90,040 USD91,916 USD130,488 USD109,236 USD113,442 USD112,816 USD175,562 USD134,756 USD135,811 USD132,672 USD190,986 USD131,284 USD1,094,067 USD1,094,067 USDBenefits4800077272072007200072,000 USD217,000 USD
PORTFOLIO FINANCIALS

Drill from portfolio to initiative to cost line

The portfolio view shows budget, forecast, actuals and variance to plan, and opens down to each initiative, workstream and cost line. Every level reads from the same figures, so a forecast increase on one initiative moves the portfolio variance with it.

kFinancial StatusBudgettotal:$975,430,040CapEx$782,600,000OpEx$192,830,040Actualstotal:$645,761,730CapEx$511,904,120OpEx$133,857,610Forecast To Gototal:$361,070,000CapEx$289,650,000OpEx$71,420,000Estimate at Completiontotal:$1,006,831,730CapEx$801,554,120OpEx$205,277,610Variance to Plantotal:−$31,401,690CapEx−$18,954,120OpEx−$12,447,570Actual vs. Forecast vs. Budget$0$20M$40M$60M$80M$100M$120MMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprBudgetForecastActualActual vs. Forecast vs. Budget (Cumulative)$0$200M$400M$600M$800M$1,000M$1,200MMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprBudgetForecastActualTop Spending Vendors$0$50M$100M$150M$200MAWSMicrosoftInfosysAccentureIBMOpExCapExInitiative BreakdownValue2026-052026-062026-072026-082026-092026-102026-112026-122027-012027-022027-032027-04TotalAI-Powered Underwriting$360,000$410,000$530,000$420,000$300,000$960,000$340,000$360,000$370,000$310,000$280,000$1,280,000$5,920,000Plan$380,000$380,000$380,000$300,000$300,000$300,000$360,000$360,000$370,000$310,000$280,000$1,280,000Forecast$340,000$360,000$370,000$310,000$280,000$1,280,000Actual$360,000$410,000$530,000$420,000$300,000$960,000$340,000Digital Asset Management System$294,411,000$256,880,000$263,711,000$259,422,000$285,294,000$261,772,000$240,999,000$145,000,000$140,000,000$140,000,000$115,000,000$21,000,000$2,423,489,000
INDEPENDENT REVIEWS

What Kiplot users say on Gartner Peer Insights

Kiplot

"As mentioned in the overall experience, the
resource allocation and financial management
modules have been game changers for our team,
project sponsors and resource managers."

Director of Project Management - Finance (non-banking)

Read the full review on Gartner Peer Insights →

Kiplot

"No more chaos - straightforward and easy to use
data insights. Portfolio reporting that tells the whole
story in one place, accessible to all who need it."

Manager, Project Management - Banking

Read the full review on Gartner Peer Insights →
More reviews from Gartner Peer InsightsFewer reviews

Kiplot

"I have used Kiplot to support a large complex
portfolio of change spanning both waterfall and
agile methodologies, where initiative related data
was held in a range of systems."

Prinicipal - Healthcare and Biotech

Read the full review on Gartner Peer Insights →

Kiplot

"Our implementation experience was very
positive, with Kiplot being incredibly
responsive, engaged and knowledgeable
about the tool and our migration."

Director of Project Management - Finance (non-banking)

Read the full review on Gartner Peer Insights →

Run the portfolio month-end from one set of figures.

Book a demo
REFORECASTING

Model a mid-cycle reforecast as a scenario

When priorities shift mid-quarter, the PMO models the change as a scenario. Initiatives move, extend or drop out, and cost, capacity and benefit recalculate with each change. The investment committee reviews the trade-offs and the revised outlook before capital moves.

v5.30.1.1SMScenarios /KSC2Rebalance to capacity123CHARTSCost$125.3m$120.0m$0$7.5m$15mJulOctJan 2027AprJulOctResourcesPeak 128Peak 120Peak 116Peak 115.1Peak 114.5Peak 114Peak 106050100150Capacity 110JulOctJan 2027AprJulOctBenefit$363.6m$362.8m$361.9m$361.0m$360.1m$359.7m$359.2m$358.8m$350.0m$0$10m$20m202720282029121120Initiatives$125.3m$120.0mTotal cost$363.6m$362.8m$361.9m$361.0m$360.1m$359.7m$359.2m$358.8m$350.0mTotal benefit128120116115.1114.5114106Peak resourcing1,5801,524Total effort$238.3m$237.4m$236.6m$235.7m$234.8m$234.4m$233.9m$233.5m$230.0mNet benefitAdd filterSearch initiativesKeep totalsAdd initiativeInitiativeJul 2026AugSepOctNovDecJan 2027FebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecSustainable Finance ImplementationSustainable Finance ImplementationCapital Market ModernizationCapital Market ModernizationReal-time Analytics ImplementationReal-time Analytics ImplementationProject Voyager 3.1Project Voyager 3.1Advanced Fraud DetectionAdvanced Fraud DetectionAI Credit DecisioningchangedCustomer Experience EnhancementchangedDebt Management System RevampDebt Management System RevampDebt Management System RevampDebt Management System RevampContactless Payment RolloutContactless Payment RolloutLegacy System PhasingLegacy System PhasingBranch DigitizationBranch DigitizationRegulatory Reporting HubRegulatory Reporting HubMobile Banking RefreshMobile Banking RefreshAI Credit DecisioningCustomer Experience Enhancement

Fund the portfolio on current cost, benefit and capacity data.

Book a demo

Why enterprise organizations choose Kiplot

Enterprise depth without legacy complexity.

AI-Native Portfolio Management

AI is built into how Kiplot analyzes portfolio, financial, capacity and delivery data, surfacing risks, trade-offs and recommended actions inside the workflows teams already use.

Enterprise Depth, Modern Software

Financial control, capacity planning, governance and complex delivery without the usability and administration burden associated with legacy portfolio platforms.

Live in Weeks, Not Years

Start with the workflows that matter, deliver value quickly, then deepen the implementation over time. No multi-year transformation program before the platform becomes useful.

One Layer For Delivery and Finance

Connect portfolio decisions to delivery, financials and capacity in one integrated model, while specialist systems such as Jira, Azure DevOps, SAP, Oracle and Workday remain authoritative.

Configure It Without Consultants

Portfolio teams can configure views, workflows, fields and governance themselves, without development cycles or permanent professional-services dependency.

Two-Way Integrations

Two-way integrations keep delivery and portfolio data synchronized, so teams work in the tools they already use while leaders get a current enterprise view without manual consolidation.

Explore the rest of the platform

See how Kiplot connects planning, funding, delivery and reporting.