Microsoft Project Online retires in September 2026. Kiplot provides a structured replacement for organizations that rely on Project Online for portfolio reporting, financial oversight, and executive visibility.
Project Online
Classic PPM approach
Retirement
Migration required
Your path forward
Microsoft has announced the retirement of Project Online, with service ending in September 2026. While delivery tools such as Project Desktop and Planner remain available, organizations using Project Online as a portfolio reporting and governance layer must transition.
This timeline provides a defined window to evaluate replacement options, plan migration, and move portfolio oversight into a dedicated system of record without disrupting active delivery.
The table below reflects how Microsoft Project Online was commonly used in enterprise environments and how those same use cases are supported within Kiplot. The focus is continuity during replacement rather than a change in operating model.
| Capability | Project Online | Kiplot |
|---|---|---|
| Everything you already rely on | ||
| Project scheduling | Task management, milestones, dependencies, baselines, and Gantt charts. | Full project scheduling with Gantt, milestones, dependencies, and baselines, plus timeline views that roll up across the portfolio. |
| Governance and approvals | Stage-gate workflows, project lifecycle management, and approval processes via SharePoint. | Configurable governance workflows, stage gates, and approval chains with audit trails, and no SharePoint dependency. |
| Custom forms and fields | Enterprise custom fields and project detail pages for structured data capture. | Fully customizable forms, fields, and views that can be configured per portfolio, program, or project type. |
| Resource management | Resource assignments, availability tracking, and role-based allocation at project level. | Resource and role-based planning with cross-portfolio capacity visibility and team-level autonomy. |
| Portfolio views | Portfolio dashboards assembled from project data and enterprise custom fields. | Native portfolio views, roadmaps, and prioritization built directly on portfolio-level data, with no assembly required. |
| Budget tracking | Project-level cost tracking with budget baselines and variance reporting. | Project and portfolio-level budgets with cost tracking, forecasting, and baseline comparisons. |
| What Kiplot adds beyond Project Online | ||
| Scenario modeling | Not available. Portfolio what-if analysis required external tools or spreadsheets. | Built-in scenario modeling to compare investment options, test funding trade-offs, and assess capacity impact before committing. |
| Advanced financials | Single-currency project cost fields. Multi-currency, capitalization, and ERP reconciliation handled externally. | Multi-currency support, CapEx and OpEx classification, and direct ERP integration for real-time financial reconciliation. |
| Jira and Azure DevOps integration | No native integration. Connecting agile delivery tools required third-party connectors or custom development. | Out-of-the-box integration with Jira and Azure DevOps, so delivery progress flows into portfolio views automatically. |
| Time tracking | Basic timesheets available but rarely adopted. Most organizations used workarounds or external tools. | Native time tracking with approval workflows, integrated into capacity planning and financial reporting. |
| Enterprise reporting | OData feeds requiring Power BI or SSRS for meaningful reporting. Significant configuration effort. | Out-of-the-box enterprise reporting with role-based dashboards for executives, finance, PMO, and delivery teams. |
| Agile and hybrid delivery | Waterfall-oriented. Agile boards introduced in later versions but limited in enterprise portfolio context. | Delivery-method agnostic. Teams choose waterfall, agile, or hybrid, all governed within the same portfolio framework. |
| Outcome tracking | Benefits tracking not natively supported. Typically managed in spreadsheets post-delivery. | Continuous outcome and benefits tracking connected to delivery, with visibility from initiative through to strategic objective. |
Project Online capabilities described as they were commonly deployed in enterprise environments. Specific configurations vary by organization.
Replacing Project Online does not require a disruptive change to how teams work. Project schedules can stay in Microsoft Project Desktop, Jira, or Azure DevOps while portfolio oversight moves into a dedicated system of record.
Kiplot supports a phased migration approach that prioritizes continuity of reporting, governance, and portfolio visibility. Project data can be migrated selectively, aligned to portfolio needs rather than a full historical lift and shift.
Most organizations migrate in stages, maintaining delivery stability while reducing the operational effort required to maintain portfolio insight. Because Kiplot sits alongside existing delivery and ERP systems, an initial transition usually completes in weeks rather than months.
Replacing Project Online requires more than replicating project schedules in a new tool. Organizations need a portfolio decision layer that connects initiatives, funding, and delivery without relying on project-centric workarounds.
Kiplot sits above execution tools and alongside financial systems, providing portfolio-level visibility, governance, and decision support while delivery continues in systems such as Jira and Azure DevOps.
Kiplot replaces Microsoft Project Online as the portfolio-level system for prioritization, funding decisions, and portfolio reporting. Decisions are made at the initiative and portfolio level rather than inferred from individual project plans.
Delivery continues in tools such as Jira and Azure DevOps, while financial data remains in ERP systems. Kiplot connects these sources to replace the portfolio visibility previously assembled through Project Online, spreadsheets, and manual reconciliation.
Portfolio governance, funding models, and reporting are managed independently of individual project structures. This avoids the configuration complexity and reporting workarounds required when Project Online is used beyond its original design.
RAKBANK strengthened its strategic portfolio management capability to increase delivery confidence and maintain financial control in a regulated environment.
Kiplot is enabling us to accelerate agile execution while ensuring every initiative has clear accountability, transparent governance, and alignment to our strategic priorities.
TSB executed a £100M cost-saving programme by strengthening strategic portfolio management to improve delivery transparency, value alignment, and financial control during its transformation.
Kiplot has been a key enabler to our agile transformation agenda, driving efficiency, productivity and speed. We returned our initial investment in less than 1 year.
Microsoft has announced that Project Online will retire in September 2026. After this date, the service will no longer be available.
Organizations using Project Online must either migrate to another Microsoft product, such as Planner Premium, or transition to an alternative platform that can support their existing portfolio, reporting, and governance requirements.
Organizations generally have two paths:
The right option depends on whether Project Online was used primarily for task scheduling or as an input to broader portfolio governance.
Kiplot replaces Project Online at the portfolio decision and governance layer, not at the task execution layer.
Project schedules can continue to live in tools such as Microsoft Project Desktop, Jira, or Azure DevOps. Kiplot connects to these sources to provide portfolio-level visibility across priorities, funding, capacity, and outcomes without requiring teams to change how they deliver work.
No. Most organizations adopt a phased transition.
Kiplot supports maintaining delivery stability while portfolio reporting, governance, and executive oversight move into a dedicated system of record. Project data can be migrated selectively, aligned to portfolio needs rather than requiring a full historical lift-and-shift.
Yes. Many organizations continue to use Power BI for visualization and distribution.
The difference is that Power BI no longer acts as the portfolio system of record. Kiplot provides the underlying portfolio logic, calculations, and governance so reporting tools are used for presentation rather than manual consolidation and correction.
Timelines vary based on scale and complexity, but most organizations complete an initial transition within weeks rather than months.
Because Kiplot sits alongside existing delivery and ERP systems, organizations can establish portfolio visibility and governance without disrupting ongoing projects or rebuilding execution workflows.
The most successful transitions start by clarifying what portfolio management needs to accomplish, rather than attempting to recreate existing Project Online structures.
This includes defining how investment decisions are made, how funding and capacity are governed, and how leadership consumes portfolio insight. Tools are then evaluated based on their ability to support those decisions with less operational effort.
Plan, execute and track your way to strategic success
Forecast, budget, track and maximize financial return on investment
Empower leaders with insight to steer strategy and performance
Automate complexity, accelerate outcomes, and scale smarter decisions
The cutting edge technology that underpins Kiplot